Triva isn't available right now.
Move faster and accomplish more with a professional-grade, generative AI assistant that transforms the way you work. Thomson Reuters CoCounsel is with you every step of the way, backed by authoritative content and industry-leading expertise.
Conduct legal research efficiently and confidently using trusted content, proprietary editorial enhancements, and advanced technology.
Accelerate how you find answers with powerful generative AI capabilities and the expertise of 650+ attorney editors. With Practical Law, access thousands of expertly maintained how-to guides, templates, checklists, and more across all major practice areas.
Move faster and accomplish more with a professional-grade, generative AI assistant that transforms the way you work. Thomson Reuters CoCounsel is with you every step of the way, backed by authoritative content and industry-leading expertise.
Provides a full line of federal, state, and local programs. Save time with tax planning, preparation, and compliance.
Automate work paper preparation and eliminate data entry
Software that keeps supply chain data in one central location. Optimize operations, connect with external partners, create reports and keep inventory accurate.
Automate sales and use tax, GST, and VAT compliance. Consolidate multiple country-specific spreadsheets into a single, customizable solution and improve tax filing and return accuracy.
Search volumes of data with intuitive navigation and simple filtering parameters. Prevent, detect, and investigate crime.
Identify patterns of potentially fraudulent behavior with actionable analytics and protect resources and program integrity.
Analyze data to detect, prevent, and mitigate fraud. Focus investigation resources on the highest risks and protect programs by reducing improper payments.
Around the globe, with unmatched speed and scale, Reuters Connect gives you the power to serve your audiences in a whole new way.
Reuters Plus, the commercial content studio at the heart of Reuters, builds campaign content that helps you to connect with your audiences in meaningful and hyper-targeted ways.
Reuters.com provides readers with a rich, immersive multimedia experience when accessing the latest fast-moving global news and in-depth reporting.
Shop our latest titles
ProView Quickfinder favorite libraries
State | Conventions |
---|---|
Alabama | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Alabama Business MeF Electronic Filers Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. When creating the PDF, the name must match exactly, including capitalization. |
Alaska | None |
Arizona | None |
Arkansas | None |
California | None |
Colorado | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Colorado Corporate e-File Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Connecticut | None. However, Connecticut requests that as few PDF attachments as possible be attached to corporate returns. |
Delaware | None |
District of Columbia | None |
Florida | None |
Georgia | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Georgia Corporate Guidelines Manual. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Hawaii | Specific naming conventions are outlined in Publication EF-8, Hawaii Software Developers and Transmitters Handbook for Corporate Modernized e-file. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Idaho | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Idaho Corporate e-File Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Illinois | N/A |
Indiana | N/A |
Iowa | None |
Kansas | None |
Kentucky | Each PDF attachment should be given a unique file name and may contain letters and numbers. The name should reference the Form/Schedule and line number when possible. |
Louisiana | None |
Maine | None |
Maryland | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Maryland Corporate e-File Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Massachusetts | None |
Michigan | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Michigan Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Modernized E-file (MeF) Software Developer Guide provided to software vendors. The application checks the PDF file name against the requested naming convention and indicates with an ELF critical diagnostic how to properly rename the file if necessary. |
Michigan Cities | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the City Corporate Income Tax E-file Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Minnesota | None |
Mississippi | None |
Missouri | None |
Missouri Kansas City | None |
Montana | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Montana corporate e-file Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Nebraska | None |
New Hampshire | None |
New Jersey | None |
New Mexico | None |
New York | None |
New York City | None |
North Carolina | None |
North Dakota | None |
Oklahoma | None |
Oregon | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the Oregon Corporate e-File Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Pennsylvania | None |
Rhode Island | Rhode Island prefers that attachments be named according to the form name and year. In an example, the Historic Preservation Investment Tax Credit form would be named "Credit 286B 2023 .pdf". Rhode Island won’t reject returns with attachments that don’t conform to this naming convention. |
South Carolina | Specific naming conventions are outlined in the South Carolina Corporate E-File Handbook. Refer to it for a list of accepted file names. |
Tennessee | N/A |
Texas | N/A |
Utah | None |
Virginia | None |
Vermont | N/A |
West Virginia | Specific naming conventions have been named by the West Virginia State Tax Department for certain forms that are required to be attached to the electronic file. For those required attachments that the application doesn’t automatically generate, a diagnostic message will alert you to the specific naming convention required for the given PDF attachment. |
Wisconsin | None |